Retention in Kindergarten

Kindergarten retention is a controversial subject among parents and educators.

This mainly arises from the subjective nature of the decision. Kindergarten students do not pass or fail a subject. Their overall academic performance is considered. If your child is struggling in kindergarten, you need to consider all sides of the issue. Regardless of research findings, you and the teacher should reach an agreement and make a decision based on what is best for your child.

Reasons
Teachers usually cite several reasons to warrant retention. A student who just made the entrance age cut-off date by a month or less might be too immature physically or socially. If this is the case for your child, you might agree that he would benefit from another year in kindergarten. Another reason teachers support retention is non-mastery of basic skills like alphabet naming or counting and number recognition. If your child is striving to master these objectives, another year of instruction might be the answer.

Positive
Teachers note several positive benefits of kindergarten retention. A child has an additional year to master skills making him better prepared for first grade. Another year will also give a child time to grow physically and socially. This is important for children who had a hard time making friends or taking part in activities during the initial year of kindergarten.

Negative
Teachers also cite some negative results of kindergarten retention. A child might feel left out when he realizes that his peers have gone to first grade. This could lead to resentment during the school year that affects his academic achievement. A retained child might show some behavior problems as a result of this resentment or from boredom. Many times a child in kindergarten will advance until the second semester; repeating skills that he already knows might be redundant for him.

Research
As a parent considering retaining your child in kindergarten, you need to be aware of research findings. Two separate studies concluded that there were no lasting benefits for a child who repeated kindergarten. Math and reading proficiency were not increased dramatically enough to justify retention. In fact, at-risk students who were promoted to first grade performed just as well or better on standardized tests than children who stayed another year in kindergarten.

Back to Top